Eaton v. Peck
26 Mich. 57, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 153
Opinion
We find no error in this record. The first objection [60]*60taken, is disposed of by tbe case of Arnold v. Nye, 23 Mich., 286; and the second to onr comprehension, raises only a question of identity of the persons to whom the commission was issued and those who executed it, which, we think, is settled by the return.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eaton v. Peck, 26 Mich. 57, 1872 Mich. LEXIS 153 (Mich. 1872).
26 Mich. 57 (Eaton v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Chaddock v. Barry
53 N.W. 785 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)
Rifenburg v. City of Muskegon
47 N.W. 231 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)