Eaton v. Kennemer

675 So. 2d 1302, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 133, 1996 WL 101223
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 8, 1996
DocketAV93000722
StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 1302 (Eaton v. Kennemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaton v. Kennemer, 675 So. 2d 1302, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 133, 1996 WL 101223 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the case remanded. See Ex parte Eaton, 675 So.2d 1300 (Ala.1996). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is now reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Eaton
675 So. 2d 1300 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 1302, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 133, 1996 WL 101223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-kennemer-alacivapp-1996.