Eaton v. Gillet

17 Wis. 435
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

DfXON, C. J.

The complaint states a good cause of action. Part payment within the period prescribed takes a case out of the statute of limitations. This was determined in Cleveland vs. Harrison, 15 Wis., 670; but as this [436]*436case arose before that was decided, and as we then listened to a lengthy and most elaborate argument of the question, we. cannot pronounce the demurrer to have been frivolous, though it might have been so had it been taken since that decision. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eaton v. Gillet, 17 Wis. 435 (Wis. 1863).

17 Wis. 435 (Eaton v. Gillet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Lovejoy
40 N.W. 627 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)
Allen v. O'Donald
28 F. 17 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)
Engmann v. Estate of Immel
18 N.W. 182 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)