Eaton v. George
42 N.H. 375
Opinion
If a trust resulted to Kennard, that can not avail the plaintiff in this suit, where he stands merely as the subsequent assignee of the void note and mortgage executed by Nancy G-eorge; no trust has resulted in the plaintiff’s favor, and there has been no transfer to him of any interest that Kennard might have by way of resulting trust. The bill must, therefore, be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eaton v. George, 42 N.H. 375 (N.H. 1861).
42 N.H. 375 (Eaton v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whipple v. Giles
55 N.H. 139 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1875)