Eaton v. Garely

825 So. 2d 1151, 2002 La. LEXIS 2697, 2002 WL 31174784
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 18, 2002·No. No. 2002-CC-1970·Published

Opinion

In re Garely, Alan D. M.D. et al.; Yordan-Jovet, Raul, M.D.; Meaux, Rachelle M.D.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 99-16684; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-0922.

Granted. Although the filing of the claim in the wrong agency suspended prescription under the pre 1997 version of La. R.S. 40:1299.47A(2)(a), prescription began to run pursuant to that statute when the agency advised plaintiffs that the defendant was not qualified. Plaintiffs did not file their claim with the proper agency within the time limits set forth in LA. R.S. 40:1299.47A(2)(a). See Savoy v. University Medical Center, 96-2074 (La.11/15/96), 682 So.2d 747. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the exception of prescription is granted.

CALOGERO, C.J., would deny the writ. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. WEIMER, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eaton v. Garely, 825 So. 2d 1151, 2002 La. LEXIS 2697, 2002 WL 31174784 (La. 2002).

825 So. 2d 1151 (Eaton v. Garely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savoy v. University Medical Center
682 So. 2d 747 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)