Eaton v. Freeman

58 Ga. 129
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 Ga. 129 (Eaton v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eaton v. Freeman, 58 Ga. 129 (Ga. 1877).

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

1. Where the verdict is for the premises in dispute, and a large amount for mesne profits, and there is no evidence in the record on the subject of mesne profits, the verdict, as a whole, is without sufficient evidence to support it.

2. Where the plaintiff’s evidence shows that the defendant acquired possession of the premises under a written contract between the parties for an exchange of lands, the contract ought to be produced or accounted for. Its terms, and a failure by defendant to comply with them, ought to appear.

3. A deed executed in another state and attested by two witnesses, one of whom purports to be a justice of the peace, is not prepared for record without further authentication ; and though recorded, it is not admissible in evidence, even as color of title, without proof of execution. Code, §2106; 9 Ga. 440; 20 Ib. 312.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patellis v. Tanner
34 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Eaton v. Freeman
63 Ga. 535 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ga. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-freeman-ga-1877.