Eaton v. Division of Employment Security
This text of 301 S.W.3d 133 (Eaton v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Claimant, Christine Eaton, appeals pro se from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision denying claimant unemployment compensation benefits.
The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion inciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 S.W.3d 133, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2010.