Eaton v. Delay

155 N.W. 644, 32 N.D. 328, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 63
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1915·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Christianson, J.

The plaintiff, at the solicitation of the defendant Delay, agreed to loan him $575, upon the condition that the joint promissory note of the three defendants, Delay, Jones, and Dunn, for that amount be executed and delivered to the plaintiff. The note was executed and delivered, and the defendant Delay received from the plaintiff the full amount of the loan agreed upon. The note as delivered to plaintiff was in words, figures, and form as follows:

About December 1, 1912, at the request of the defendant Delay, the plaintiff agreed to extend the time of payment to May 1, 1913. The defendant Delay thereafter paid the interest due on the note up to December 1, 1912, such interest payment being received by plaintiff on December 4, 1912. About this time (the record fails to disclose the exact date) plaintiff inserted in the margin of the note a notation of the extension. The note with this notation added is in words, figures, and form as follows:

[333]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eaton v. Delay, 155 N.W. 644, 32 N.D. 328, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 63 (N.D. 1915).

155 N.W. 644 (Eaton v. Delay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sloan v. State
62 S.W.2d 52 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1933)
Pearson v. Southall Brothers
12 Tenn. App. 182 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1930)
Clifton Mercantile Co. v. Gillaspie
7 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Harrington v. Leighton
208 N.W. 219 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1926)
Munson v. Scheid
145 N.E. 840 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1924)
Clem v. Chapman
262 S.W. 168 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)