Eaton v. Beach
This text of 107 A.D.2d 887 (Eaton v. Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 800.12 of the Rules of Practice, for extension of time to perfect appeal deemed abandoned denied, without costs, and appeal dismissed as academic. An appeal from the final judgment is the only method for reviewing an intermediate order after a final judgment is entered (JemaProps. v McLeod, 51 AD2d 702). In the event that an appeal is taken by plaintiff from the order granting defendants summary judgment, any error alleged in the order entered March 5, 1984, to the extent that it affects the final judgment, may be reviewed upon the appeal from the final judgment (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1). Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.2d 887, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-beach-nyappdiv-1985.