Eaton Laboratories v. West Virginia Department of Mental Health

West Virginia Court of Claims

Eaton Laboratories v. West Virginia Department of Mental Health

10 Ct. Cl. 76

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 7, 1974

DocketNo. D-695

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ct. Cl. 76 (Eaton Laboratories v. West Virginia Department of Mental Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaton Laboratories v. West Virginia Department of Mental Health, 10 Ct. Cl. 76 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

DUCKER, JUDGE:

Claimant, Eaton Laboratories of Norwich, New York, sold and delivered certain medicinal supplies to the Colin Anderson Center of the West Virginia Department of Mental Health, in accordance with orders therefor from the respondent, and after some payments on the account, there remained unpaid the sum of $47.81. It appears that the budget appropriation for the fiscal year which covered said account expired before full payment of the account was made, and payment of the balance of the account was not made because of oversight on the part of the respondent. Respondent admits that the allegations are true that the claim is reasonable, and that the account should be paid.

The Court, therefore, awards the claimant the sum of $47.81.

Award of $47.81.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUCKER, JUDGE:

Claimant, Eaton Laboratories of Norwich, New York, sold and delivered certain medicinal supplies to the Colin Anderson Center of the West Virginia Department of Mental Health, in accordance with orders therefor from the respondent, and after some payments on the account, there remained unpaid the sum of $47.81. It appears that the budget appropriation for the fiscal year which covered said account expired before full payment of the account was made, and payment of the balance of the account was not made because of oversight on the part of the respondent. Respondent admits that the allegations are true that the claim is reasonable, and that the account should be paid.

The Court, therefore, awards the claimant the sum of $47.81.

Award of $47.81.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Ct. Cl. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-laboratories-v-west-virginia-department-of-mental-health-wvctcl-1974.