Eaton Allen Corp. v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eaton Allen Corp. v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

56 A.D.2d 908, 392 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11307

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 908 (Eaton Allen Corp. v. Holmes Protection, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaton Allen Corp. v. Holmes Protection, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 908, 392 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract to provide certain electrical protective services, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 13, 1976, which denied its motion to dismiss the amended complaint or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to separately state and number the causes of action set forth in the amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The complaint is sufficiently particular to satisfy the requirements of CPLR 3013. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract to provide certain electrical protective services, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 13, 1976, which denied its motion to dismiss the amended complaint or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to separately state and number the causes of action set forth in the amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The complaint is sufficiently particular to satisfy the requirements of CPLR 3013. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 908, 392 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-allen-corp-v-holmes-protection-inc-nyappdiv-1977.