Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 1, 2017·No. 2017 NYSlipOp 51471(U)·Published

Opinion



Easy Care Acupuncture, PC, a/a/o Jonathan Nuamah, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

The Hartford Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.


Plaintiff, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, as granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, in an action to recover no-fault benefits in the sum of $2,255.

Per Curiam.

Order (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, modified to the extent of denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and reinstating the complaint; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs. (see Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v The Hartford Ins. Co., appeal numbered 17-179, decided herewith.)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur


Decision Date: November 01, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co. (Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.