Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eastwood v. State

Eastwood v. State

2 So. 3d 374, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19350, 2008 WL 5352231
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 24, 2008
DocketNo. 4D08-3721
StatusPublished

This text of 2 So. 3d 374 (Eastwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eastwood v. State, 2 So. 3d 374, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19350, 2008 WL 5352231 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court summarily denied appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion finding that it was filed beyond the two-year time limit of the rule. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b). We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Appellant timely filed his motion within two years of his convictions and sentences becoming final. Cooper v. State, 902 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). See also Small v. State, 941 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Reversed and Remanded for Further Proceedings.

KLEIN, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Small v. State
941 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cooper v. State
902 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 So. 3d 374, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19350, 2008 WL 5352231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastwood-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.