Eastside Bait & Tackle v. Humphrey

440 So. 2d 41
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1983
DocketAQ-66
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 440 So. 2d 41 (Eastside Bait & Tackle v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eastside Bait & Tackle v. Humphrey, 440 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

440 So.2d 41 (1983)

EASTSIDE BAIT & TACKLE and Florida Farm Bureau, Appellants,
v.
Corene S. HUMPHREY, Appellee.

No. AQ-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 8, 1983.

Jack A. Langdon of Jones & Langdon, Gainesville, for appellants.

No appearance by appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final order of the deputy commissioner awarding temporary partial disability benefits calculated upon claimant's ability to work 20 hours per week at the prevailing minimum wage. The deputy's finding that claimant was TPD from October 31, *42 1980 to April 8, 1982 is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. The deputy's tacit excusal of a work search by finding that, although claimant did not actually work during the 17 months in question, she was able to work 20 hours per week at the prevailing minimum wage during that period, must be reversed.

At the hearing, claimant testified that she had not looked for any type of job since the injury and that if she were to consider any employment, she would limit the number of hours worked so as not to forfeit her social security retirement benefits. The record does not disclose evidence that would excuse, on the basis of her mental or physical condition, claimant's failure to conduct an adequate job search. A conscientious work search is the Chapter 440 obligation of any injured and unemployed worker not physically disabled to work. Holiday Care Center v. Scriven, 418 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In the absence of a conscientious work search or a medically justifiable excusal from the duty to look for work, there is no entitlement to TPD compensation. The deputy's award of TPD benefits from October 31, 1980 to April 8, 1982 is therefore reversed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kessler v. Community Blood Bank
621 So. 2d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Lovell Bros., Inc. v. Kittles
518 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hill v. Baptist Hospital
464 So. 2d 1350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Franklin
467 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mt. Sinai Medical Center v. Samuels
453 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 So. 2d 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastside-bait-tackle-v-humphrey-fladistctapp-1983.