Easton v. Weir

228 So. 2d 396
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 1969
DocketNos. 69-29, 69-216
StatusPublished

This text of 228 So. 2d 396 (Easton v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Easton v. Weir, 228 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have studied the record, briefs and all other papers filed in this matter and find that appellant has substantially made the same argument in this appeal as he did in the case of Easton v. Weir, Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 115. No error having been made to appear in his appeal from the order discharging surety and from the' order discharging the garnishee, the orders herein appealed from are affirmed.

Appellee requests that certain language contained in appellant’s brief regarding ap-pellee’s lawyer be expunged from the record. This court takes judicial notice of the fact that appellee’s lawyer, Sam Mann, Jr., is a highly respected member of The Florida Bar. Therefore, that language contained in appellant’s brief going to Mr. Mann’s honesty and integrity should be and the same is hereby expunged from the record on the authority of State ex rel. Carter v. Beggs, Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 423.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, J., concur. MANN, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Easton v. Weir
125 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 So. 2d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easton-v-weir-fladistctapp-1969.