Easton v. McAllister

1 Mo. 662
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

M’Girk, C. J.,

delivered the1 opinion of the Court.

The question submitted for the consideration of the- Court is, at what time does, the statute-of limitations begin.to-run against a note payable-on demand?

The statute is, that the action shall he brought within five years after the cause of action hath accrued'. That we understand to mean, that whenever the debt is in a situation ^o he sued: on, thenceforward, the- statute- runs. Now, the law is well settled, that a suit may be brought on this sort of note-as soon as made. Then, it must! result that the statute runs on such note from its date. This appears to he the law, as. understood by Sergeant Williams in 2 Saunders, 63, c. fig. 2, or more correctly, 63, a note 6.

Let the judgment he rendered for Easton..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Easton v. McAllister, 1 Mo. 662 (Mo. 1826).

1 Mo. 662 (Easton v. McAllister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Charles Savings Bank v. Thompson
223 S.W. 734 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)
Boyd v. Buchanan
162 S.W. 1075 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Darby v. Darby
45 So. 747 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
Jameson v. Jameson
72 Mo. 640 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1880)