Easton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Easton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

280 S.W.3d 793, 2009 WL 1054958

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2009·No. ED 91457·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Joseph Easton (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the Director of Revenue on Appellant’s petition for review of the revocation of his driver’s license under Section 577.041 RSMo 2006. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm *794 the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Joseph Easton (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the Director of Revenue on Appellant’s petition for review of the revocation of his driver’s license under Section 577.041 RSMo 2006. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm *794 the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Easton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE, 280 S.W.3d 793, 2009 WL 1054958 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

280 S.W.3d 793 (Easton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.