Home/Supreme Court/Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co.

Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co.

231 U.S. 738, 34 S. Ct. 317
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 17, 1913
DocketNo. 436
StatusPublished

This text of 231 U.S. 738 (Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co., 231 U.S. 738, 34 S. Ct. 317 (1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of United States v. Congress Construction Co., 222 U. S. 199; Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. Hogg, 219 U. S. 195; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225; Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355.

Mr. Chas. W. Dorr, Mr. Aldis B. Browne, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. McKay
161 U.S. 355 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott
191 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside Mills
219 U.S. 186 (Supreme Court, 1911)
United States v. Congress Construction Co.
222 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 U.S. 738, 34 S. Ct. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easton-v-chicago-hotel-co-scotus-1913.