Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong

300 A.D.2d 344, 751 N.Y.S.2d 767
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2002·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 3, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the evidence submitted by the plaintiff established that the defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1160 (c), the plaintiff failed to establish his freedom from comparative negligence as a matter of law (see Millus v Milford, 289 AD2d 543). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong, 300 A.D.2d 344, 751 N.Y.S.2d 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 344 (Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robbins v. Panzarino
94 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Villa v. Leandrou
94 A.D.3d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Roman v. A1 Limousine, Inc.
76 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Cali v. Mustafa
68 A.D.3d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Ruthinoski v. Brinkman
63 A.D.3d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Lopez v. Reyes-Flores
52 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Wallace v. Dubin
20 A.D.3d 412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Valore v. McIntosh
8 A.D.3d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)