Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong
This text of 300 A.D.2d 344 (Eastmond v. Wen Po Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 3, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Although the evidence submitted by the plaintiff established that the defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1160 (c), the plaintiff failed to establish his freedom from comparative negligence as a matter of law (see Millus v Milford, 289 AD2d 543). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 A.D.2d 344, 751 N.Y.S.2d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastmond-v-wen-po-wong-nyappdiv-2002.