Eastman v. Tuttle

1 Cow. 248
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Cow. 248 (Eastman v. Tuttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eastman v. Tuttle, 1 Cow. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Opinion

Curia.

The Justice decided correctly. It was immatc* ’n whom the title was. The plaintiff had the possess-i°n ; and the defendant did not set up any claim by way of [249]*249set off for the plaintiff’s use and occupation of the land, hut merely offered to shew the naked fact of title. The absence of the juror is not sufficient cause for reversing the judgment. The examination of the witness was suspended, as soon as the absence of the juror was discovered; and when he re-appeared the examination commenced de novo. He heard all the testimony. It was air inadvertence bn the part of the Court as well as the parties, but no injury resulted from it.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Robinson
64 F. 603 (Second Circuit, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cow. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastman-v-tuttle-nysupct-1823.