Eastman v. Mayor of New York

The Superior Court of New York City

Eastman v. Mayor of New York

13 Misc. 774, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 870

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJuly 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Misc. 774 (Eastman v. Mayor of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eastman v. Mayor of New York, 13 Misc. 774, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract by which the defendants granted to the plaintiff the right to collect all the wharfage and cranage of a certain bulkhead. The defendants disclaim any liability whatever, while the plaintiff contends that the verdict directed in his favor is insufficient in amount. An examinaction of the case has satisfied us that the views expressed'by the learned trial judge on directing the verdict were correct and that upon the evidence before him the verdict was properly directed.

The judgment should be affirmed on both appeals, but without costs to either party.

Present: Fbeedman and McAdam, JJ. ■

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract by which the defendants granted to the plaintiff the right to collect all the wharfage and cranage of a certain bulkhead. The defendants disclaim any liability whatever, while the plaintiff contends that the verdict directed in his favor is insufficient in amount. An examinaction of the case has satisfied us that the views expressed'by the learned trial judge on directing the verdict were correct and that upon the evidence before him the verdict was properly directed.

The judgment should be affirmed on both appeals, but without costs to either party.

Present: Fbeedman and McAdam, JJ. ■

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Misc. 774, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastman-v-mayor-of-new-york-nysuperctnyc-1895.