Eastman v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance

977 So. 2d 962, 7 La.App. 3 Cir. 01079, 2007 La. App. LEXIS 2464, 2007 WL 4440169
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 30, 2007·No. No. CW 07-01079·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. We find that the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs request for jury trial. Louisiana Revised Statute 22:1430.17 identifies the defendant corporation as a “political instrumentality” rather than a “political subdivision” of the state. Additionally, the statute clearly states that the corporation is not an agency of the state. Furthermore, the statutes that follow show that the corporation is not in the nature of a political subdivision or state agency. Louisiana Revised Statute 22:1430.2(B)(1) differentiates between the assets of the corporation and the general funds of the state, and subsection D(£) of that same section subjects the corporation only to those provisions of La.R.S. 42:4.1-13 and La.R.S. 44:1-41 for purposes of public body consideration. The mere fact that the entity was created by legislative act does not make it a political subdivision of the state or a state agency. Therefore, the trial court’s ruling is reversed, and the jury trial is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastman v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance, 977 So. 2d 962, 7 La.App. 3 Cir. 01079, 2007 La. App. LEXIS 2464, 2007 WL 4440169 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

977 So. 2d 962 (Eastman v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert E. Thompson v. Cenac Towing Co., L.L.C.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021
Zentner v. Seacor Marine, Inc.
977 So. 2d 962 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)