Eastman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
246 S.E.2d 393, 146 Ga. App. 339, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2347
Opinion
Where, as in the case sub judice, the enumerations of error require a consideration of the transcript of evidence which appellant expressly chose not to include in the appeal, we must presume that the trial court correctly ruled on the issues presented. Walsey v. Lockhart, 140 Ga. App. 348 (2) (231 SE2d 124); Buford v. Buford, 234 Ga. 700, 703 (217 SE2d 160).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eastman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 246 S.E.2d 393, 146 Ga. App. 339, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).
246 S.E.2d 393 (Eastman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnett v. Freeman
278 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)