Eastman v. Boston & Maine Railroad
43 N.E. 115, 165 Mass. 342, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 258
This text of 43 N.E. 115 (Eastman v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eastman v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 43 N.E. 115, 165 Mass. 342, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 258 (Mass. 1896).
Opinion
The statements by the plaintiff were simply a narrative of what had happened, and were not admissible as part of the res gestae. Lane v. Bryant, 9 Gray, 245. Commonwealth v. Hackett, 2 Allen, 136. Commonwealth v. McLaughlin, 5 Allen, 507. Williamson v. Cambridge Railroad, 144 Mass. 148.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Hampton
221 N.E.2d 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)
Rocco v. Boston-Leader, Inc.
17 Mass. App. Dec. 65 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1959)
People v. Strewl
246 A.D. 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Dawson v. Bankers Life Co.
247 N.W. 279 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Murray v. Boston & Maine Railroad
61 L.R.A. 495 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1903)
Cole v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
55 N.E. 1044 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 N.E. 115, 165 Mass. 342, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastman-v-boston-maine-railroad-mass-1896.