Eastman v. Armstrong

Illinois Supreme Court

Eastman v. Armstrong

26 Ill. 216

Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Breese, J.

The evidence shows very "conclusively, that there was a mutual abandonment of the award before suit brought, which brings this case within the rule in Burnside v. Potts, 23 Ill. 415.

We held there, that parties might agree to abandon an award, and by so doing, they are necessarily remitted to their original rights. That case is decisive of this. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breese, J.

The evidence shows very "conclusively, that there was a mutual abandonment of the award before suit brought, which brings this case within the rule in Burnside v. Potts, 23 Ill. 415.

We held there, that parties might agree to abandon an award, and by so doing, they are necessarily remitted to their original rights. That case is decisive of this. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Eastman v. Armstrong, 26 Ill. 216 (Ill. 1861).

Pincite

26 Ill. 216 (Eastman v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related