Home/Supreme Court/Eastman Kodak Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

330 U.S. 828, 91 L. Ed. 1277, 67 S. Ct. 869, 72 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 529, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 3008
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 3, 1947·No. No. 955·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 330 U.S. 828, 91 L. Ed. 1277, 67 S. Ct. 869, 72 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 529, 1947 U.S. LEXIS 3008 (1947).

330 U.S. 828 (Eastman Kodak Co. v. Federal Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6678, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,923 Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Indian Reservation, Cross-Appellee, and Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe v. State of Washington William R. Wilkerson, Individually and as Acting Director of the State of Washington Department of Fisheries Frank R. Lockard, Individually and as Director of the State of Washington Department of Game Washington State Game Commission, and United States of America v. State of Washington
96 F.3d 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington
96 F.3d 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of Washington
969 F.2d 752 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. David H. Moore
613 F.2d 1029 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. State of Mich.
471 F. Supp. 192 (W.D. Michigan, 1979)
United States v. Michigan
471 F. Supp. 192 (W.D. Michigan, 1979)
United States v. Bouchard
464 F. Supp. 1316 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1978)
People v. LeBlanc
248 N.W.2d 199 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Gilbert H. Paulton
540 F.2d 886 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Richard Kay Harpel
493 F.2d 346 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Pollmann
364 F. Supp. 995 (D. Montana, 1973)
Bowen v. New York News, Inc.
366 F. Supp. 651 (S.D. New York, 1973)
State v. Brown
301 A.2d 547 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1972)
Wells v. United States
281 A.2d 226 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1971)
United States v. State of Alaska
423 F.2d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
The Cherokee Nation or Tribe of Indians in Oklahoma, the Choctaw Nation and the Chickasaw Nation v. State of Oklahoma
402 F.2d 739 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United States
389 F.2d 778 (Court of Claims, 1968)
Shulton, Inc. v. Consumer Value Stores, Inc.
227 N.E.2d 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)
State v. Cherry
387 S.W.2d 149 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Jay O. Franks v. United States Lines Company
324 F.2d 126 (Second Circuit, 1963)