Eastgate Corporate Park, LLC v. Assessor

54 A.D.3d 1036, 865 N.Y.S.2d 249
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2008·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

In six related tax certiorari proceedings, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Dickerson, J.), dated November 28, 2006, which granted the respondents’ motion to vacate the notes of issue and dismiss the proceedings.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In these tax certiorari proceedings, the petitioner failed to comply with the mandatory language of 22 NYCRR 202.59 (b) and (d) (1) by completely failing to file the required income and expense statements, and further by failing to timely serve those statements on the respondents before filing the notes of issue. Moreover, the petitioner made no showing of good cause to excuse the errors (see 22 NYCRR 202.1 [b]), and did not make any attempt to correct the defects within the strictly enforced four-year period set forth in RPTL 718 (2) (d) (see generally Matter of Sullivan LaFarge v Town of Mamakating, 94 NY2d [1037]*1037802 [1999]; Matter of Waldbaums #122 v Board of Assessors of City of Mount Vernon, 58 NY2d 818; Matter of Santa’s Workshop, Inc. v Board of Assessors of Town of Wilmington, 13 AD3d 1047 [2004]; Matter of Pherbo Realty Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Fishkill, 104 AD2d 1037 [1984]). Accordingly, contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion to vacate the notes of issue and dismiss the proceedings (see Matter of Rose Mount Vernon Corp. v Assessor of City of Mount Vernon, 15 AD3d 585 [2005]; Matter of Pyramid Crossgates Co. v Board of Assessors of Town of Guilderland, 302 AD2d 826 [2003]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Balkin, and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Spolzino, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the order appealed from and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a new determination in accordance with the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastgate Corporate Park, LLC v. Assessor, 54 A.D.3d 1036, 865 N.Y.S.2d 249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

54 A.D.3d 1036 (Eastgate Corporate Park, LLC v. Assessor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of 314 Rutledge St., LLC v. Tax Commn. of the City of N.Y.
2020 NY Slip Op 07562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Adrian Family Partners I, LP v. Town of Yorktown
2018 NY Slip Op 8642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Bank of New York Mellon v. Izmirligil
2016 NY Slip Op 8033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Plaro Estates, Inc. v. Assessor
101 A.D.3d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Al Turi Landfill, Inc. v. Town of Goshen
93 A.D.3d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ardsley Country Club v. Assessor of Greenburgh
24 Misc. 3d 1118 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)