Eastes v. Daubenspeck

4 Ind. 617, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 248

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions in this case, or what purports to be such, does not appear to be signed by any judge. The errors complained of arise upon no other part of the record.

We cannot take any notice of the contents of the alleged bill of exceptions in the absence of the authentication of a judge’s signature.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.