Easterwood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Easterwood v. State

1930 OK CR 275, 288 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 32, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 10, 1930

DocketNo. A-7353.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 275 (Easterwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Easterwood v. State, 1930 OK CR 275, 288 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 32, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the county court of McCurtain county of the crime of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, and they were sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 29th day of April, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiffs in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

*33 A careful examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

There being no errors depriving the plaintiffs in error of any substantial right, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the county court of McCurtain county of the crime of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, and they were sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 29th day of April, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiffs in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

*33 A careful examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

There being no errors depriving the plaintiffs in error of any substantial right, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 275, 288 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 32, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easterwood-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.