Easterwood v. State
This text of Easterwood v. State (Easterwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 06-OCT-2023 10:57 AM Dkt. 9 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
JOHN CLINTON EASTERWOOD, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX (CR. NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, J., Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Eddins, J., recused, and Circuit Judges Chang and Wong, assigned by reason of vacancies)
Petitioner John Clinton Easterwood’s Application for
Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 27, 2023, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 6, 2023.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ R. Mark Browning
/s/ Gary W.B. Chang
/s/ Paul B.K. Wong
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Easterwood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easterwood-v-state-haw-2023.