Eastern Transportation Company v. Vera Cruz

Second Circuit

Eastern Transportation Company v. Vera Cruz

186 F.2d 305, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 2, 1951

Docket21828_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 F.2d 305 (Eastern Transportation Company v. Vera Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eastern Transportation Company v. Vera Cruz, 186 F.2d 305, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120 (2d Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

186 F.2d 305

EASTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, as charterer in possession,
of the barge LAKE FRUMET, Libellant-Appellee,
v.
Steamship VERA CRUZ and The Texas Company,
Claimant-Respondent-Appellant, and Tug BERMUDA and
Southern Transportation Company,
Claimant-Respondent-Appellee.

No. 114, Docket 21828.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 12, 1950.
Decided Jan. 2, 1951.

Tompkins, Boal & Tompkins, New York City, Arthur M. Boal, New York City, for claimant-respondent-appellant.

Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, Nicholas J. Healy, 3rd and J. Lester Parsons, Jr., New York City, for claimant-respondent-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on opinion of Kennedy, J., 94 F.Supp. 695.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI