Home/Supreme Court/Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman

Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman

361 U.S. 805
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1959
DocketNo. 34; No. 112; No. 139; No. 172
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 361 U.S. 805 (Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eastern States Petroleum Corp. v. Prettyman, 361 U.S. 805 (1959).

Opinion

[805]*805Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of mandamus denied.

[806]*806Reported below: No. 34, Mise., 105 U. S. App. D, C. 219, 265 F. 2d 593; No. 112, Mise., 106 U. S. App. D. C. 14, 268 F. 2d 889.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adell Kirkland, as Mother and Next Friend of Libbie Kirkland, an Infant v. George C. Wallace, as Governor of the State of Alabama
403 F.2d 413 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Bussie v. Long
254 F. Supp. 797 (E.D. Louisiana, 1966)
Fort Harrison Telecasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Illiana Telecasting Corporation, Wabash Valley Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenors. 220 Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Signal Hill Telecastingcorporation, Intervenors. Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Signal Hill Telecasting Corporation, Illiana Telecasting Corporation, Americanbroadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Plains Television Corporation, 220television,inc., the State of Illinois, Metromedia, Inc., Intervenors
324 F.2d 379 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Fort Harrison Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
324 F.2d 379 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Henry F. Bell, as President of Local 1804 International Longshoremen's Association (Afl-Cio) and in Behalf of the Members of Local 1804 v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, Henry F. Bell, as President of Local 1804-1 International Longshoremen's Association (Afl-Cio) and in Behalf of the Members of Local 1804-1 v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
279 F.2d 853 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
279 F.2d 853 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States
280 F.2d 611 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 U.S. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastern-states-petroleum-corp-v-prettyman-scotus-1959.