Eastern Shore Public Service Co. v. Seaford
306 U.S. 616, 59 S. Ct. 483
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344, 345; New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U. S. 18, 30; Seattle & Renton Ry. Co. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U. S. 272, 277. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eastern Shore Public Service Co. v. Seaford, 306 U.S. 616, 59 S. Ct. 483 (1939).
306 U.S. 616 (Eastern Shore Public Service Co. v. Seaford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.
125 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1888)
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
185 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. v. Washington Ex Rel. Linhoff
231 U.S. 568 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Long Sault Development Co. v. Call
242 U.S. 272 (Supreme Court, 1916)