Eastern Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 1169
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 3, 1927·No. Docket No. 12163·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[1170] OPINION.

Smith :

The taxing act permits a corporate taxpayer to deduct from gross income in its income-tax returns ordinary and necessary expenses. Section 234(a)(1), Revenue Act of 1921. The respondent disallowed the deduction of the cost of moving and resetting machines upon the supposition that it represented the cost of improvements and betterments. The evidence clearly shows, however, that such was not the case. The amount was a legal deduction from gross income.

Judgment will be entered on 16 days’ notice, under Rule 60.

Considered by Littleton, Trussell, and Love.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastern Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 1169 (bta 1927).

8 B.T.A. 1169 (Eastern Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maier Brewing Co. v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 385 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Charles Baloian Co. v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 620 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Eastern Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 1169 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)