Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Dole

Second Circuit

Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Dole

804 F.2d 804

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1986

DocketNo. 403, Docket 86-6162

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 804 F.2d 804 (Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Dole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Dole, 804 F.2d 804 (2d Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Jose A. Cabranes, J., granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing for lack of ripeness plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. 638 F.Supp. 1297 (D.Conn. 1986). Plaintiffs claim, among other things, that defendants have failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Cabranes’s opinion. Our decision is without prejudice to whatever rights plaintiffs may have in state court to challenge under state law the State of Connecticut’s acquisition of property in connection with a proposed highway project.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Jose A. Cabranes, J., granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing for lack of ripeness plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. 638 F.Supp. 1297 (D.Conn. 1986). Plaintiffs claim, among other things, that defendants have failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Cabranes’s opinion. Our decision is without prejudice to whatever rights plaintiffs may have in state court to challenge under state law the State of Connecticut’s acquisition of property in connection with a proposed highway project.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 F.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastern-connecticut-citizens-action-group-inc-v-dole-ca2-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack