Eastern Building Corp. v. United States

96 Ct. Cl. 438, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 104, 1942 WL 4467

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eastern Building Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ct. Cl. 399 →

United States Court of Claims·Decided April 6, 1942·No. No. 45269·Published

Opinion

[443]*443The court decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, in an opinion

per curiam,

as follows:

This case is governed by the decision of the court in the case of Eastern Building Corporation v. The United States, No. 45222, decided this date. The petition is therefore dismissed. It is so ordered.

Littleton, Judge, and WhitakeR, Judge, dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in said case No. 45222.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[443]*443The court decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, in an opinion

per curiam,

as follows:

Littleton, Judge, and WhitakeR, Judge, dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in said case No. 45222.

Eastern Building Corp. v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 438, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 104, 1942 WL 4467 (cc 1942).

Pincite

96 Ct. Cl. 438 (Eastern Building Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.