Eastern Banking Co. v. Seeley

81 N.W. 852, 59 Neb. 676, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 35
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 1900·No. No. 10,919·Published

Opinion

Holcomb, J.

The appellants, defendants in foreclosure proceedings of a real estate mortgage, object to the confirmation of sale upon the sole ground that “no notice was given to the defendants, or either of them, of the time and place of the appraisement, and the said defendants were not permitted to give or produce evidence before the said appraisers concerning the.value of the-said premises.” Upon the authority of Tillson v. Benschoter, 55 Nebr., 443, Mills v. Hamer, 55 Nebr., 445, and Maginn v. Pickard, 57 [677] Nebr., 642, this objection can not be sustained. The order of the lower court confirming the sale is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eastern Banking Co. v. Seeley, 81 N.W. 852, 59 Neb. 676, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 35 (Neb. 1900).

81 N.W. 852 (Eastern Banking Co. v. Seeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.