Eastern Banking Co. v. Seeley
This text of 81 N.W. 852 (Eastern Banking Co. v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants, defendants in foreclosure proceedings of a real estate mortgage, object to the confirmation of sale upon the sole ground that “no notice was given to the defendants, or either of them, of the time and place of the appraisement, and the said defendants were not permitted to give or produce evidence before the said appraisers concerning the.value of the-said premises.” Upon the authority of Tillson v. Benschoter, 55 Nebr., 443, Mills v. Hamer, 55 Nebr., 445, and Maginn v. Pickard, 57 [677]*677Nebr., 642, this objection can not be sustained. The order of the lower court confirming the sale is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 N.W. 852, 59 Neb. 676, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastern-banking-co-v-seeley-neb-1900.