Eastern Airlines v. Main
This text of 502 So. 2d 502 (Eastern Airlines v. Main) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In appealing the deputy commissioner’s order awarding benefits, the employer and carrier contend that the deputy erred in awarding wage loss benefits because (1) claimant voluntarily limited his income, and (2) claimant failed to conduct a good faith job search. After careful consideration of the arguments and briefs, we conclude that the record contains competent, substantial evidence to sustain the deputy’s findings and order. Whether or not we would have reached the same factual conclusion as did the deputy commissioner, we will not undertake to retry the facts on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 So. 2d 502, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 534, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastern-airlines-v-main-fladistctapp-1987.