Easterling v. State
97 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 92, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 56
Opinion
1. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, contains a correct statement of the .law. If a fuller charge was desired an appropriate and timely written request should have been made therefor. “A correct statement, of the law applicable to the case is not erroneous because the court failed in the same connection to give the jury other and fuller instructions.” Killian v. State, 19 Ga. App. 750 (2) (92 S. E. 227) ; Hill v. State, 18 Ga. App. 259 (89 S. E. 351), and cases cited.
2. There was ample evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Easterling v. State, 97 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 92, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 56 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
97 S.E. 553 (Easterling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. State
89 S.E. 351 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Killian v. State
92 S.E. 227 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)