Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Easterling v. State

Easterling v. State

103 So. 901, 20 Ala. App. 453, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 386
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 16, 1924
Docket5 Div. 540.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 So. 901 (Easterling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Easterling v. State, 103 So. 901, 20 Ala. App. 453, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 386 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

Affirmed on authority of Lum Roseberry v. State, ante, p. 450, 103 So. 898.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Easterling
103 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 So. 901, 20 Ala. App. 453, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easterling-v-state-alactapp-1924.