Easterling v. State

103 So. 901, 20 Ala. App. 453, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 386
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1924·No. 5 Div. 540.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

Affirmed on authority of Lum Roseberry v. State, ante, p. 450, 103 So. 898.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Easterling v. State, 103 So. 901, 20 Ala. App. 453, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 386 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

103 So. 901 (Easterling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Easterling
103 So. 901 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)