Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Easterday v. SECREST WARDLE LYNCH HAMPTON TRUEX & MORLEY, PC

Easterday v. SECREST WARDLE LYNCH HAMPTON TRUEX & MORLEY, PC

714 N.W.2d 320, 475 Mich. 871, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1008
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 30, 2006
Docket130492
StatusPublished

This text of 714 N.W.2d 320 (Easterday v. SECREST WARDLE LYNCH HAMPTON TRUEX & MORLEY, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Easterday v. SECREST WARDLE LYNCH HAMPTON TRUEX & MORLEY, PC, 714 N.W.2d 320, 475 Mich. 871, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1008 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

714 N.W.2d 320 (2006)
475 Mich. 871

Victoria EASTERDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECREST WARDLE LYNCH HAMPTON TRUEX & MORLEY, P.C., and Frank A. Fleischmann, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130492. COA No. 262650.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 N.W.2d 320, 475 Mich. 871, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easterday-v-secrest-wardle-lynch-hampton-truex-mor-mich-2006.