Easterbrooks v. R. I. Suburban Railway Co.
This text of 66 A. 298 (Easterbrooks v. R. I. Suburban Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that the defendant was entitled to» a continuance in this case, and that its exception to the refusal, of the court to grant the motion to that effect must be' sustained.
The practice of asking for an increase of the ad damnum at. the beginning of the trial, in a case where the damages are unliquidated, is not to be commended, and as we said in O’Clair v. R. I. Co., 27 R. I. 448, when the discussion of such a motion is permitted in the presence of the jury who are to decide the case, it is good ground for a continuance if the defendant desires it.
Case remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A. 298, 28 R.I. 234, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/easterbrooks-v-r-i-suburban-railway-co-ri-1907.