Eastburn v. Yardley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Eastburn v. Yardley

8 F. Cas. 266, 30 Leg. Int. 404, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1606

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 21, 1873

DocketCase No. 4,252

StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. Cas. 266 (Eastburn v. Yardley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eastburn v. Yardley, 8 F. Cas. 266, 30 Leg. Int. 404, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1606 (circtedpa 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

The following interlocutory decree was-made by

CADWALADER, District Judge:

The court, as at present advised, does not see sufficient cause to order a temporary injunction, except as to the personal effects-levied upon; nor as to those effects for any reason that should prevent them from being ultimately liable to the execution. But for-asmuch as the execution creditor may have-a twofold security on real estate, as well as-on the said personal effects, and the creditors-in bankruptcy only a single security, to wit: on these effects, and a brief period ought therefore, to be allowed the said creditors to-pay the execution creditor, and obtain a transfer of her judgment and execution, or to enable them to obtain such other equitable-relief as may not impair her rights. Therefore the defendant, Elizabeth Yardley, execution creditor as aforesaid, is restrained,, until further direction, from proceeding under the said execution, as to the said personal effects, so, however, as not to impair any security under the levy thereon, which is to-stand and avail her against the assignee and estate in bankruptcy, as if this order had not been made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following interlocutory decree was-made by

CADWALADER, District Judge:

The court, as at present advised, does not see sufficient cause to order a temporary injunction, except as to the personal effects-levied upon; nor as to those effects for any reason that should prevent them from being ultimately liable to the execution. But for-asmuch as the execution creditor may have-a twofold security on real estate, as well as-on the said personal effects, and the creditors-in bankruptcy only a single security, to wit: on these effects, and a brief period ought therefore, to be allowed the said creditors to-pay the execution creditor, and obtain a transfer of her judgment and execution, or to enable them to obtain such other equitable-relief as may not impair her rights. Therefore the defendant, Elizabeth Yardley, execution creditor as aforesaid, is restrained,, until further direction, from proceeding under the said execution, as to the said personal effects, so, however, as not to impair any security under the levy thereon, which is to-stand and avail her against the assignee and estate in bankruptcy, as if this order had not been made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F. Cas. 266, 30 Leg. Int. 404, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eastburn-v-yardley-circtedpa-1873.