EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
180 CA 13-00755 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, AND DAVID P. DURKIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE A/E, DOING BUSINESS AS QPK DESIGNS, VINCENT NICOTRA, LINDA K. STORRINGS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
D’ARRIGO & COTE, LIVERPOOL (MARIO D’ARRIGO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (SAMUEL M. VULCANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 24, 2013. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants Quinlivan, Pierik & Krause A/E, doing business as QPK Designs, Vincent Nicotra and Linda K. Storrings to dismiss the complaint against them.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in East2West Constr. Co., LLC v The First Republic Corp. of Am. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 21, 2014]).
Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE (EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.