EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2014·No. CA 13-00755·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

180 CA 13-00755 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, AND DAVID P. DURKIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE A/E, DOING BUSINESS AS QPK DESIGNS, VINCENT NICOTRA, LINDA K. STORRINGS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

D’ARRIGO & COTE, LIVERPOOL (MARIO D’ARRIGO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (SAMUEL M. VULCANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 24, 2013. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants Quinlivan, Pierik & Krause A/E, doing business as QPK Designs, Vincent Nicotra and Linda K. Storrings to dismiss the complaint against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in East2West Constr. Co., LLC v The First Republic Corp. of Am. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 21, 2014]).

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE (EAST2WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. QUINLIVAN, PIERIK & KRAUSE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.