East v. Thomas
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered June 10, 1994, which, upon a jury verdict finding the defendants not at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the verdict in favor of the defendants should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence since it was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Buckenberger v Clark Constr. Corp., 208 AD2d 790; DiLauro v Hochman, 189 AD2d 795).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
222 A.D.2d 646 (East v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.