East v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

East v. State

130 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 632

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 18, 1930

Docket4 Div. 725.

StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 920 (East v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East v. State, 130 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 632 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon an indictment which charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws, this defendant was tried and convicted and was duly sentenced to perform hard labor for the county.

This appeal from the judgment of conviction is predicated upon the record proper only; there being no bill of exceptions.

The record appears regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon an indictment which charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws, this defendant was tried and convicted and was duly sentenced to perform hard labor for the county.

This appeal from the judgment of conviction is predicated upon the record proper only; there being no bill of exceptions.

The record appears regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-v-state-alactapp-1930.