East Texas Public Service Co. v. Pounders

283 S.W. 568, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 1099
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 1926
DocketNo. 3198.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 283 S.W. 568 (East Texas Public Service Co. v. Pounders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
East Texas Public Service Co. v. Pounders, 283 S.W. 568, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 1099 (Tex. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

HODGES, J.

In October, 1924, the appellant, in constructing a transmission line through the premises of the appellee, removed a wire fence in two places — the entrance and the exit. It is conceded that appellant had a right of way across the land 100 feet wide. The failure to repair the fence is the basis of the damages here sued for. The appellee testified that in January following the removal of the fences he had.an -opportunity- to rent his land for three months as a pasture for stock, but lost the contract, because the appellant failed to repair, the fence. He brought this suit to recover $100, the amount of the rental offered and lost, and a judgment was rendered in his favor for that sum.

It is insisted in this appeal that the only damages which the appellee could recover was the cost of replacing, or repairing, the fence. The evidence shows that this Required no special skill, and but little labor, and no reason is assigned why appellee did not himself do the repairing except that the appellant agreed to do it. 'This was not, under the facts of this case, sufficient to relieve the appellee from the duty of minimizing the damages resulting from appellant’s failure to perform its duty. .He had ample time to do that after discovering the dereliction of the appellant, and before the rental contract was to begin.

We think appellant’s contention is correct, and -that the court erred in rendering judgment for the value of the contract lost. The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Rodocker
84 S.W.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
West Texas Utilities Co. v. Renner
53 S.W.2d 451 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)
Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurry
41 S.W.2d 215 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1931)
Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.
39 S.W.2d 1091 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 S.W. 568, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-texas-public-service-co-v-pounders-texapp-1926.