Home/Fourth Circuit/East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage

East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage

369 F.3d 357, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9895, 2004 WL 1119190
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 F.3d 808 →
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2004·No. Nos. 03-1708 through 03-1741; 03-1797·Published

Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc

Appellants filed petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The Panel voted to deny rehearing.

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Judge Widener voted to rehear the case en banc, and Judges Niemeyer, Luttig, Michael, Motz, Traxler, [363]*363Gregory, Shedd and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins and Judges Wilkinson, Williams and King are disqualified.

The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Entered at the direction of Judge Michael for the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage, 369 F.3d 357, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9895, 2004 WL 1119190 (4th Cir. 2004).

369 F.3d 357 (East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.