East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck
18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598
Opinion
For a long time after the argument this case was held up, considered and reconsidered. After studying the facts maturely and with the utmost solicitude to reach a right result, the members of the court arrived at the unanimous conclusion that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that for this reason alone the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. The line of thought which led to this conclusion is indicated in the first head-note. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck, 18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598 (Ga. 1893).
18 S.E. 358 (East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pinkston v. Cedar Hill Nursery & Orchard Co.
51 S.E. 387 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)