East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck

18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 24, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

For a long time after the argument this case was held up, considered and reconsidered. After studying the facts maturely and with the utmost solicitude to reach a right result, the members of the court arrived at the unanimous conclusion that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that for this reason alone the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. The line of thought which led to this conclusion is indicated in the first head-note. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck, 18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598 (Ga. 1893).

18 S.E. 358 (East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinkston v. Cedar Hill Nursery & Orchard Co.
51 S.E. 387 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)