East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck

Supreme Court of Georgia

East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck

18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 24, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 S.E. 358 (East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Harbuck, 18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598 (Ga. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

For a long time after the argument this case was held up, considered and reconsidered. After studying the facts maturely and with the utmost solicitude to reach a right result, the members of the court arrived at the unanimous conclusion that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that for this reason alone the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. The line of thought which led to this conclusion is indicated in the first head-note. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

For a long time after the argument this case was held up, considered and reconsidered. After studying the facts maturely and with the utmost solicitude to reach a right result, the members of the court arrived at the unanimous conclusion that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that for this reason alone the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. The line of thought which led to this conclusion is indicated in the first head-note. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 S.E. 358, 91 Ga. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-tenn-va-ga-railway-co-v-harbuck-ga-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack