East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary
81 Ala. 159
Opinion
— The charges were given at the instance of the plaintiff below — appellee here — and there was a general exception to the giving of the two. In such case, unless both charges are faulty, the exception avails nothing. 3 Brick. Dig. 80, §§ 34, 35,41; Bedwell v. Bedwell, 77 Ala. 587.
The charge first asked and given is unquestionably free from error. Neither the facts hypothesized, nor any testimony found in this record, tended to show the cross-ties belonged to Shortridge.
No other question is raised by the exceptions.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary, 81 Ala. 159 (Ala. 1886).
81 Ala. 159 (East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Campbell
97 Ala. 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Stitt v. State
91 Ala. 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.
85 Ala. 504 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)