East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary

81 Ala. 159
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 Ala. 159 (East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Cary, 81 Ala. 159 (Ala. 1886).

Opinion

STONE, C. J.

— The charges were given at the instance of the plaintiff below — appellee here — and there was a general exception to the giving of the two. In such case, unless both charges are faulty, the exception avails nothing. 3 Brick. Dig. 80, §§ 34, 35,41; Bedwell v. Bedwell, 77 Ala. 587.

The charge first asked and given is unquestionably free from error. Neither the facts hypothesized, nor any testimony found in this record, tended to show the cross-ties belonged to Shortridge.

No other question is raised by the exceptions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Campbell
97 Ala. 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Stitt v. State
91 Ala. 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.
5 So. 89 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Ala. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/east-tenn-va-ga-r-r-v-cary-ala-1886.